| Title |
Guidelines for Acquisition, Interpretation, and Reporting of Whole-Body MRI in Myeloma: Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (MY-RADS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1148/radiol.2019181949 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina Messiou, Jens Hillengass, Stefan Delorme, Frédéric E Lecouvet, Lia A Moulopoulos, David J Collins, Matthew D Blackledge, Niels Abildgaard, Brian Østergaard, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Ola Landgren, Jon Thor Asmussen, Martin F Kaiser, Anwar Padhani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 14% |
| Spain | 9 | 12% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 22% |
| Scientists | 11 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 215 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Researcher | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 64 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 109 | 51% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#870,893
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Radiology
#608
of 10,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,204
of 369,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiology
#16
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.